11-07-2017, 01:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2017, 05:42 PM byjosuevivash.)
(11-03-2017, 02:29 PM)RoboDK Wrote:Thank you for your feedback.
Can you try with the following installer?
//www.sinclairbody.com/downloads/Install-Rob....8-GL4.exe
Let us know if the perfomance improves. This installer contains the 3D engine we will soon use for our official release.
It is a simplified version of RoboDK but 100% OpenGL, it should use the latest OpenGL version available.
Brilliant, happy to help.
I used FRAPS to measure the FPS and few RoboDK example files.
Note: I had to copy the file Qt5PrintSupport.dll from version v3.2.9 to run the v3.2.8-GL4 (I hope that this doesn't make difference for this test)
v3.2.8-GL4: The performance and stability are better compared to the previous OpenGL version. I have to say that v3.2.8-GL4 render the same as v3.2.9. no crash, almost the same average fps across this 2 versions, with one exception: in v3.2.9 the trajectory path lines are not visible (neither the white or the yellow).
Milling 8 Axes on v3.2.8-GL4 [b](on v3.2.9):[/b]
- Intel:V-sync: application controlled
- 英伟达方形住宅区V-sync on, Tripple buffering On:
SprayGun tutorial on v3.2.8-GL4:
Note: if you run the program with the spray gun in a loop, the frame rate drops to 3 FPS after the 3rd time running.
- 英伟达方形住宅区V-sync on, Tripple buffering On:
I found a weird 45 degrees tearing and incomplete frames in any version with the Quadro. But you will find the optimal settings for the current public version (v3.2.9) below with NO weird tearing thanks to V-Sync option turned off:
Test on v3.2.9 (GPU array option OFF).
- 英伟达方形住宅区
- Vsync OFF
- Triple bufferingOn.
Best Quaily: 35-38fps Best Performance: 63-65fps
Spray Gun single run
Best Quaily: 19-51fps Best Performance: 20-38fps
[b]Spray Gun looping[/b]
Best Quaily: 6-8fps Best Performance: 12-18fps
[b]机器人铣削机器人(2)[/b]
Best Quaily: 20-37fps Best Performance: 30-71fps
[b]Robot milling (5 axis)[/b]
Best Quaily: 30-64fps Best Performance: 45-115fps
Conclusions:
If you run RoboDK with Intel HD graphics 520/620 is stable but the FPS would be top 35fps and with more robots and geometries you can expect 20fps or less (traditionally CAD software packages aim for 25-30fps).
My recommended settings
- V-Sync OFF and triple buffering ON.
- CPU: Go withHigh frequencyCPU, more than 4 cores is not useful (as with most of the CAD packages)
- GPU: go with high computing power. In my tests, 250MB of dedicated video memory were enough.
- Complex models?: Maybe a single $800-$1200 nvidia GTX 1070/1080/Titan will get you more performance than a single $3000-$6000 Quadro