[mytrail]

Hello,

I am new to RoboDK, when I import my robot and choose the type of it, insert all the lengths, certain parts when using theJoint axis jogwill move but separately from the rest of the parts.

Anybody experienced such problems?

[Olivier]

Hello mytrail,

Can you provide more details on the issues, like screenshot and the .rdk ?

Olivier

[mytrail]

Hello mytrail,

Can you provide more details on the issues, like screenshot and the .rdk ?

Olivier

I could send you the rdk file via mail

[Jeremy]

Did you watch these videos?
I'm touching on that issue in the second one:

https://youtu.be/-woD7T27hGQ
https://youtu.be/OSY_BGlUpFc

Jeremy

[mytrail]

Did you watch these videos?
I'm touching on that issue in the second one:

https://youtu.be/-woD7T27hGQ
https://youtu.be/OSY_BGlUpFc

Jeremy

Thank you for those links, judging by what I saw it must be a measurement error that is causing some parts to detach.

[mytrail]

Did you watch these videos?
I'm touching on that issue in the second one:

https://youtu.be/-woD7T27hGQ
https://youtu.be/OSY_BGlUpFc

Jeremy

How accurate do the model measurements have to be? What is tolerated?

[Jeremy]

There's no tolerance if you want it to properly rotate.
You need to precisely know the position of one joint axis with respect to the other.

If you can't send screenshots it will be hard for us to help you.

Jeremy

[mytrail]

There's no tolerance if you want it to properly rotate.
You need to precisely know the position of one joint axis with respect to the other.

If you can't send screenshots it will be hard for us to help you.

Jeremy

I did it and it now rotates fine and is controllable via the joint axis jog, my next question is why 4x4 matrix of reference position with respect to base gives me these output, I thought it would match these paper calculation I made

[mytrail]

There's no tolerance if you want it to properly rotate.
You need to precisely know the position of one joint axis with respect to the other.

If you can't send screenshots it will be hard for us to help you.

Jeremy

我解决了宽容/测量问题,现在everything rotates fine and is controllable via the joint axis jog.

However I took a look at the reference Frame of the tool with respect to the base and the 4x4 matrix is not the same as what I get when I calculate it.

Now the 28.563 I can understand as it seems to be close to the d2 value I put of 27 mm

And 643.39 I dont know where that came from

[Jeremy]

Are you sure that you are comparing apples with apples here?
Is this really the position of the robot (in RDK) when the joints are all zeros?

Knowing if it's supposed to be 245 or 643 mm in Z should be easy by simply measuring the 3D model.

Just looking at it with the perspective and all, it seems to make sense that the TCP is as high (Z) as it's far (X) from the robot base.

Jeremy