Staubli_VAL3_simplified Post processor- Printable Version +- RoboDK Forum (//www.sinclairbody.com/forum) +-- Forum: RoboDK (EN) (//www.sinclairbody.com/forum/Forum-RoboDK-EN) +--- Forum: RoboDK bugs (//www.sinclairbody.com/forum/Forum-RoboDK-bugs) +——线程:Staubli_VAL3_simplified processor (/Thread-Staubli-VAL3-simplified-Post-processor) |
Staubli_VAL3_simplified Post processor-RonanLB-11-08-2018 Hi, We are new users of RoboDK and we think there are 2 smalls bugs in “Staubli_VAL3_simplified”: 1) "def Pose_2_Staubli" line 120 to 123 should be comment/supress to use "Pose_2_Staubli" from robodk library which as the good behaviour instead of this one (angle was given in radian instead of degree); 2) In the definition of "def angles_2_str(angles)" line 135 should be corrected from "str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i, angles[i])) " to " str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i+1, angles[i]))" in order to have a numbering of "j" from j1 to j6. Thanks for your answer if you have encoutered the same problems or if it comes from a missunderstanding of our use of RoboDK software. Ronan LB RE: Staubli_VAL3_simplified Post processor-Albert-11-15-2018 Hi RonanLB, Thank you for letting us know about this post processor issue. We have fixed these 2 issues with the simplified Stäubli post processor and updated it with our latest release. I attached the file for reference. Albert |