RoboDK Forum
Staubli_VAL3_simplified Post processor- Printable Version

+- RoboDK Forum (//www.sinclairbody.com/forum)
+-- Forum: RoboDK (EN) (//www.sinclairbody.com/forum/Forum-RoboDK-EN)
+--- Forum: RoboDK bugs (//www.sinclairbody.com/forum/Forum-RoboDK-bugs)
+——线程:Staubli_VAL3_simplified processor (/Thread-Staubli-VAL3-simplified-Post-processor)



Staubli_VAL3_simplified Post processor-RonanLB-11-08-2018

Hi,

We are new users of RoboDK and we think there are 2 smalls bugs in “Staubli_VAL3_simplified”:

1) "def Pose_2_Staubli" line 120 to 123 should be comment/supress to use "Pose_2_Staubli" from robodk library which as the good behaviour instead of this one (angle was given in radian instead of degree);

2) In the definition of "def angles_2_str(angles)" line 135 should be corrected from
"str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i, angles[i])) " to " str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i+1, angles[i]))" in order to have a numbering of "j" from j1 to j6.

Thanks for your answer if you have encoutered the same problems or if it comes from a missunderstanding of our use of RoboDK software.

Ronan LB


RE: Staubli_VAL3_simplified Post processor-Albert-11-15-2018

Hi RonanLB,

Thank you for letting us know about this post processor issue. We have fixed these 2 issues with the simplified Stäubli post processor and updated it with our latest release.

I attached the file for reference.

Albert