11-08-2018, 05:21 PM
Hi,
We are new users of RoboDK and we think there are 2 smalls bugs in “Staubli_VAL3_simplified”:
1) "def Pose_2_Staubli" line 120 to 123 should be comment/supress to use "Pose_2_Staubli" from robodk library which as the good behaviour instead of this one (angle was given in radian instead of degree);
2) In the definition of "def angles_2_str(angles)" line 135 should be corrected from
"str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i, angles[i])) " to " str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i+1, angles[i]))" in order to have a numbering of "j" from j1 to j6.
Thanks for your answer if you have encoutered the same problems or if it comes from a missunderstanding of our use of RoboDK software.
罗南磅
We are new users of RoboDK and we think there are 2 smalls bugs in “Staubli_VAL3_simplified”:
1) "def Pose_2_Staubli" line 120 to 123 should be comment/supress to use "Pose_2_Staubli" from robodk library which as the good behaviour instead of this one (angle was given in radian instead of degree);
2) In the definition of "def angles_2_str(angles)" line 135 should be corrected from
"str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i, angles[i])) " to " str = str + ('j%i="%.5f" ' % (i+1, angles[i]))" in order to have a numbering of "j" from j1 to j6.
Thanks for your answer if you have encoutered the same problems or if it comes from a missunderstanding of our use of RoboDK software.
罗南磅