[Andrew_AS]

Hello, in Fanuc LS programs points can have a text name assigned to them to allow for easier reading of the program.

What would be helpful, is if a point in a program or a rob targets name has been changed from the default Target XX, that changed name would be handy if it populated in the LS file as part of the post process.

1:J P[1:Test Name] 32% CNT100 ;

/POS
P[1:"Test Name"]{
GP1:


With some of the automotive suppliers, we name Pick, drop, pounce, etc.

Thanks.

[Jeremy]

I'm not in charge of the development, but I do "upvote" this one.

Jeremy

[Jeremy]

Hi Andrew,

去od news, this is now possible!
This option is now available with the latest version of RoboDK.

But as for now, we need to modify all post-processor to include this feature.
Let me know if you want the option on one post-processor in particular.

Jeremy

[Andrew_AS]

Awesome. I'm primarily using it on the Fanuc 30iA post-processor.

It would probably be worthwhile to duplicate the 30iA post-processor into a 30iB/30iB+ post-processor and include some of the new string name limits. With the 30iB+s being rolled out and now being the main go to for builds it would probably be good to include. We are starting to see quite a few 30iB+s on jobs now.

[Jeremy]

Hi Andrew,

We'll take a look at that.
Do you know what's the new string name limits? This was pretty limitive in the past.

Jeremy

[Andrew_AS]

I can check for you next week. I'll be on site with a 30iB+. It's pretty large now. I think its 24 characters for programs and 32 for program comments.

[Jeremy]

That's great news.
Finally!

[robotfrenchman]

Hi Andrew,

去od news, this is now possible!
This option is now available with the latest version of RoboDK.

But as for now, we need to modify all post-processor to include this feature.
Let me know if you want the option on one post-processor in particular.

Jeremy

Hi,
I am using V5.1.1 and I am wondering if there is an option to print the point name from within the tree instead of printing a LIN command. If not, is there a way to modify the post processor for this?